To Michael Nuwer, I do not think the econophysics movement looks much like the usual "economic imperialism," which traditionally involved going into sociology or political science or wherever and, a la, Gary Becker, imposing the homogeneous rational agent model on their topics. This may be a bit more like Kahnemann and Tversky, coming writing papers on econ topics while formally staying in psychology. One difference is that while a small amount of this econophysics stuff is being published in economics journals, the vast majority of it continues to be appearing in physics journals not even indexed in the JEL, and thus basically outside the consciousness of all but a few economists. Some of this also reflectst the much longer lag times involved in getting a paper refereed and published in economics journals compared to physics (and other hard science) journals, where the social norms are much more socially responsible than they have been in economics. Lots of physicists say "I don't want to waste my time with your journals and their long lags." Most of the papers that have appeared in economics journals have involved an economist (or two) as a coauthor, and as more of this coauthoring and collaboration occurs, we may see more of this work showing up in the economics journals. Barkley Rosser