As someone who has done some work on the measurement of health literacy, I
agree with Jenny that there is a problem with the literature/research on
health literacy related to how health literacy is operationalised in much of
this literature/research. There is no doubt that most of the research and
literature does focus at the individual level and that the existing measures
(including our own) do not fully capture the essence of what health literacy
is or might be. However, there is a growing realization by people working in
the field that health literacy is more than an individual phenomenon. As the
Institute of Medicine Committee pointed out in their 2004 report, health
literacy has to do with the interaction between the individual and the
various health contexts that they encounter in their lives. Unfortunately,
this is a very difficult conceptualization to operationalize and although
there is some work taking place to try to do so, it is still in its infancy.
In the meantime, we are still relying on individual level measures, and
inadequate ones at that. Thus, statements such as the one noted by Stasha
have to be taken with a grain of salt. What I think would be fair to say,
based on existing research is that literacy is one outcome of education that
appears to have a strong direct and indirect impact on health; and health
literacy which is in part, an outcome of general literacy and other kinds of
literacies (e.g. scientific literacy) as well as life-long learning, has a
mainly a direct effect on health. In other words, as suggested by Stacha
both literacy and health literacy are "downstream" factors that appear to
affect health, or perhaps "mechanisms" though which education and other
"upstream" factors such as those noted by Stacha affect health. This doesn't
mean that they are unimportant, but they probably don't qualify as
"determinants of health" in sense of  "causes of the causes" as defined by
the Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. 

 

 

I hope this is helpful.

 

Irv Rootman

Adjunct Professor, Human and Social Development

University of Victoria, British Columbia

 

 

 

From:        "Popay, Jennie" <[log in to unmask]> 
To:        [log in to unmask] 
Date:        2011-02-04 05:41 AM 
Subject:        Re: [SDOH] Heath Literacy as a Key Determiant of Health 
Sent by:        Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]> 

  _____  




Agree entirely with Dennis's recently reply re Wright Mills on psychologism
but there is an additional dimension to/problem with the literature/research
on health literacy whcih relates to how health literacy is operationalised
in much of this research.     I am not totally up to date with research in
this area (it has a tendency to depress me and given where our ConDem
coalition are taking us just now in the UK in terms of the wider
determinants of health I have more than enough triggers for depression
without voluntarily adding any more), however there is a tendency to
collective evidence via structured questionnaires with all the problems
associated with the construction of appropriate questions and to define
health 'illiteracy' in terms of a lack of more 'scientific' knowledge about
causes e.g. do people know what 'healthy food' is, do they realise how
important it is to take exercise, etc.   As research has shown (see our own
now dated modest contribution referenced below) there are key difference
between the perspective obtained on 'lay' knowledge about health
inequalities/causality depending on the research methods used to obtain it.
Always seemed to me that health professionals illiteracy about health
inequalities and causal pathways is a much more serious problem for SDOH
policies/action that any lack of quasi-scientific knowledge amongst lay
people.   But these are just my prejudices. 
Jennie 


  
Popay, J Bennett, S. Thomas, C. Williams, G. Gatrell, A. Bostock, L. (2003)
Beyond Beer, Fags Egg and Chips? Exploring lay understandings of social
inequalities in health, Sociology of Health and Illness. 25(1)1 - 23   
  
Professor of Sociology and Public health 
School of Health and Medicine 
Lancaster University 
Lancaster UK 
  
From: Social Determinants of Health [ <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stasha Donahue
Sent: 04 February 2011 06:19
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [SDOH] Heath Literacy as a Key Determiant of Health 
  
Hi all SDOH list participants 
  
I recently read this statement from an in house not yet released document
which was essentially a literature review on health literacy done by an
external consultant in Calgary.  I wanted to gain perspective from others
via this posting. 
  
"Health literacy is highly correlated with health outcomes and is considered
a better predictor of health status than education, socioeconomic status,
employment, race/ethnicity, or gender".   
  
I have yet to read the full document as I am too busy conducting focus
groups with AHS staff with regards to Reducing Health Disparities across the
province. 
  
I am just wondering how the rest of the SDOH list thinks about that
statement regarding health literacy... particularly those in Population and
Public Health realms?   
  
From what I have read and reviewed health literacy is a function of
determinants such as eduction, employment, income levels etc?  This (health
literacy) seems kind of downstream to me as a previous ground level evidence
based population health practitioner focussed on poverty reduction and SDOH
for health equity. 
Of course, far be it for me to criticize AHS... 
  
Any thoughts?  And feel free to challenge me if you think I am incorrect in
my thinking... 
  
  
Stasha Donahue 
Health Promotion Specialist -Reducing Disparities 
Health Promotion, Disease & Injury Prevention 
Population and Public Health 
Fort Macleod Health Care Centre 
Box 520 
Fort Macleod, AB T0L 0Z0 
Tel: 403-553-5352 Fax: 403-553-2333 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
From a population health perspective, I strongly disagree with this
statement.   
  
  
  

 

  _____  


This message and any attached documents are only for the use of the intended
recipient(s), are confidential and may contain privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, retransmission, or other disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately, and then delete the original message. Thank you. 
To leave, manage or join list:
https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh
<https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1> &A=1 

To leave, manage or join list:
https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh
<https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1> &A=1 


To leave, manage or join list: https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1