I am sure that was not your
intent. It just shows through in the selections, e.g. of Thomas Sowell, a
tendentious political editorialist. The fact that some HET contributors could
unconsciously see him and similar propagandists as objective HET scholars is
what concerns me. It is like moving the editorial page to the news
columns of a newspaper without even thinking they might be different.
This
is not to focus my animus on “wingnuts” of neo-anarchism. I
would say the same about Paul Krugman and Robert Reich, for example. It’s
the one-sidedness and preoccupation with superficial and cosmetic current political
symbolic issues and sloganeering that I’d like to see exorcised from HET.
Mason Gaffney
From: Societies for the
History of Economics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 4:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SHOE] The HET "good reads" list
No one is equating HET with anything. If someone asks a
question, he deserves an answer. Nothing political was suggested or
implied.
Charles McCann