Yes, indeed, or when "its" is spelled "it's." On 5/15/13 4:10 PM, "Dustin Zima" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >Never bodes well when the writer gets the title of the text wrong.=20 > >On May 15, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Scott Holmes <[log in to unmask]> >wrote:= > > >> >>http://www.crisismagazine.com/2013/the-adventures-of-huckleberry-finn-by- >>m= >ark-twain-two-views >>=20 >> Here are two reviews of Huckleberry Finn, not some much the book but >> more attempts at describing Huck's character. The comments are equally >> important and as with the respondent Stella, the Huck defined in these >> two reviews is not the Huck of my own mind. I view Huck as neither king >> nor moralist. In fact, I don't see him as heroic at all. I see Huck as >> someone without ambition finding his own way along the middle path. He >> recognizes and even accepts the legal and moral structure of the society >> he exists in, but he has a natural talent for evading it's more virulent >> aspects. His acts are acts of his heart, not his mind nor his morals. >