All good questions. Perhaps "errata" should be taken euphemistically in this case. Personally, I think "lapses" is a better fit. > On Feb 13, 2015, at 3:25 PM, Barbara Schmidt <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Other issues that I have not yet seen publicly addressed regard the > questions -- Were public employees on the public payroll when the book > was being produced? Did anyone involved receive personal profit? What was > the initial print run? If not published for anyone's personal profit, but > as a fundraising effort, then the details should be public record. Are > they? Why was Little Brown, the publisher, involved when the government has > their own printing office? Did Little Brown go through a bid process for > rights to publish the book? If so, the amount they paid should be public > record. Is it? > > Martin is correct in stating "the issues regarding this book are more > serious than a series of "mistakes" would imply." > > Barb