The following two books are supposed to be 'discussions of academic politics in Stalinist and post-Stalinist Russia' (according to Francis Spufford's notes in Red Plenty):

Loren R. Graham (1972). Science and Philosophy in the Soviet Union. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Slava Gerovitch (2002). From Newspeak to Cyberspeak: A History of Soviet Cybernetics. Boston: The MIT Press.



>-------- Оригинално писмо --------
>От: David Andrews [log in to unmask]
>Относно: Re: [SHOE] Economists and censorship
>До: [log in to unmask]
>Изпратено на: 27.03.2017 21:31

I’m not sure I would call it a methodological study, but there is an interesting essay by Leo Strauss on “Persecution and the Art of Writing” that addresses the issue. It’s published in a book of the same name, U. of Chicago Press, 1952.

David Andrews

From: Societies for the History of Economics < [log in to unmask])">[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Federico D'Onofrio < [log in to unmask])">[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Societies for the History of Economics < [log in to unmask])">[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 5:27 AM
To: < [log in to unmask])">[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [SHOE] Economists and censorship

Dear all,
One of the issues that strike me whenever I study economists who worked in difficult times and under illiberal regimes such as imperial Russia and Austria-Hungary or fascist Italy is the issue of censorship. This is particularly clear in the case of Marxist economists in 19th century Russia, such as Nikolaj Sieber on whom I am now writing togeher with Francois Allisson and Danila Raskov. Sieber published in censored Russian journals as well as illegal ones published abroad. Is there a methodological study on publication and rhetorical strategies adopted by economists at risk of being censored?
Thank you for your help,