[Selections by Humberto Barreto for SHOE list.]


nep-hpe <http://nep.repec.org/nep-hpe.html> New Economics Papers
<http://nep.repec.org/> on History and Philosophy of Economics

Issue of 2022‒06‒13
papers chosen by
Erik Thomson <http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pth72.htm>
University of Manitoba <http://umanitoba.ca/>
------------------------------

   1. De l’homo oeconomicus empathique à l’homo sympathicus Les apports de
   la sympathie smithienne à la compréhension des comportements prosociaux
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7246125966923069481_p1> By Vanessa
   Oltra <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Vanessa%20Oltra>
   2. Categorical versus graded beliefs
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7246125966923069481_p2> By Franz
   Dietrich
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Franz%20Dietrich>
   3. On the recent philosophy of decision theory
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7246125966923069481_p3> By Moscati,
   Ivan <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Moscati,%20Ivan>
   4. Good, Economic Welfare and the National Dividend—Pigou’s Welfare Triad
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7246125966923069481_p4> By Aldrich,
   John <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Aldrich,%20John>
   5. Is the Price Right? The Role of Morals, Ideology, and Tradeoff
   Thinking in Explaining Reactions to Price Surges
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7246125966923069481_p5> By Julio
   Elias <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Julio%20Elias>;
Nicola
   Lacetera
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Nicola%20Lacetera>; Mario
   Macis <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Mario%20Macis>
   6. What have the 2021 Nobel laureates done for us?
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7246125966923069481_p6> By
Jörn-Steffen
   Pischke
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=J%C3%B6rn-Steffen%20Pischke>
   7. Can a Catholic be Liberal? Roman Catholicism and Liberalism in a
   Political Economy Perspective (1800–1970)
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7246125966923069481_p7> By Stefano
   Solari
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Stefano%20Solari>
   8. Gender Economics: Dead-Ends and New Opportunities
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7246125966923069481_p10> By Lundberg,
   Shelly
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Lundberg,%20Shelly>
   9. Morals as Luxury Goods and Political Polarization
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7246125966923069481_p11> By Benjamin
   Enke <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Benjamin%20Enke>
   ; Mattias Polborn
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Mattias%20Polborn>; Alex
   Wu <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Alex%20Wu>
   10. Remembering David Marsden
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7246125966923069481_p12> By David
   Metcalf
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=David%20Metcalf>
   11. A Theory of Hypocrisy
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7246125966923069481_p13> By Alice
   Hallman
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Alice%20Hallman>; Daniel
   Spiro <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Daniel%20Spiro>
   12. JHET Interviews: Anthony Waterman
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7246125966923069481_p14> By Emmett,
   Ross <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Emmett,%20Ross>

------------------------------

   1. De l’homo oeconomicus empathique à l’homo sympathicus Les apports de
   la sympathie smithienne à la compréhension des comportements prosociaux
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03623609>
   By: Vanessa Oltra
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Vanessa%20Oltra> (BSE
   - Bordeaux Sciences Economiques - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS -
   Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
   Abstract: Modern economic approaches of empathy and sympathy aim at
   adding an altruistic dimension to the standard economic decision theory.
   The purpose of the introduction of another regarding dimension, in addition
   to the sole personal interest, is to try to explain prosocial preferences
   or behaviours. In this article, we show how and why the economic literature
   tries to grasp those concepts, but in a way that is very far from the
   original Smithian sympathy developed in his Theory of Moral Sentiments
   (TSM). We argue that, by remaining in the framework of methodological
   individualism and instrumental rationality, economic approaches,
   particularly in the field of experimental and behavioural economics, tend
   to reduce and to intrumentalize the concepts of sympathy and empathy. Such
   approaches seem to us not consistent with the Smithian social philosophy of
   human nature and interpersonal relationships.
   Keywords: Smithian sympathy,Empathy,Theory of moral
   snetiments,behavioural economics
   Date: 2022–03–29
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03623609&r=
   2. Categorical versus graded beliefs
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:mse:cesdoc:21032r>
   By: Franz Dietrich
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Franz%20Dietrich> (Centre
   d'Economie de la Sorbonne, Paris School of Economics)
   Abstract: This essay discusses the difficulty to reconcile two paradigms
   about beliefs: the binary or categorical paradigm of yes/no beliefs and the
   probabilistic paradigm of degrees of belief. The possibility for someone to
   hold beliefs of both types simultaneously is challenged by the lottery
   paradox, and more recently by a general impossibility theorem. The nature,
   relevance, and implications of the tension are explained and assessed. A
   more technical elaboration can be found in Dietrich and List (2018, 2021)s
   Keywords: logic vs. rational choice theory; yes/no belief vs. subjective
   probabilities; lottery paradox; general impossibility theorem
   JEL: D80 D83
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=D80%20D83>
   Date: 2021–11
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:mse:cesdoc:21032r&r=
   3. On the recent philosophy of decision theory
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:115039>
   By: Moscati, Ivan
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Moscati,%20Ivan>
   Abstract: In the philosophy of economics, the last fifteen years have
   witnessed an intense discussion about the epistemological status of
   economic models of decision making and their theoretical components, such
   as the concept of preference. In this article I offer a selective review of
   this discussion and indicate the directions in which I believe it should
   evolve.
   Keywords: behaviorism; choice; heuristics; mentalism; naturalism;
   Preference; scientific realism and antirealism
   JEL: J1 <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=J1>
   Date: 2021–01–02
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:lserod:115039&r=
   4. Good, Economic Welfare and the National Dividend—Pigou’s Welfare Triad
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2vzrx>
   By: Aldrich, John
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Aldrich,%20John>
   Abstract: Pigou’s welfare treatises are exercises in practical ethics.
   The exercises were founded on the ethical concepts of goodness and economic
   welfare with the economist’s national dividend providing the practical
   instrument for solving economic problems. This paper follows this triad
   from its origins in Pigou’s earliest writings on ethics and economic
   policy, into the welfare treatises and onto his last writings—a period of
   around 50 years.
   Date: 2022–04–09
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2vzrx&r=
   5. Is the Price Right? The Role of Morals, Ideology, and Tradeoff
   Thinking in Explaining Reactions to Price Surges
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9712>
   By: Julio Elias
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Julio%20Elias>; Nicola
   Lacetera
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Nicola%20Lacetera>; Mario
   Macis <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Mario%20Macis>
   Abstract: Price surges often generate social disapproval and requests
   for regulation and price controls, but these interventions may cause
   inefficiencies and shortages. To study how individuals perceive and reason
   about sudden price increases for different products under different policy
   regimes, we conduct a survey experiment with Canadian and U.S. residents.
   Econometric and textual analyses indicate that prices are not seen just as
   signals of scarcity; they cause widespread opposition and strong and
   polarized moral reactions. However, acceptance of unregulated prices is
   higher when potential economic tradeoffs between unregulated and controlled
   prices are salient and when higher production costs contribute to the price
   increases. The salience of tradeoffs also reduces the polarization of moral
   judgments between supporters and opponents of unregulated pricing. In part,
   the acceptance of free price adjustments is driven by people’s overall
   attitudes about the function of markets and the government in society.
   These findings are corroborated by a donation experiment, and they suggest
   that awareness of the causes and potential consequences of price increases
   may induce less extreme views about the role of market institutions in
   governing the economy.
   Keywords: price surges, price controls, preferences, morality, tradeoffs
   JEL: C91 D63 D91 I11
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=C91%20D63%20D91%20I11>
   Date: 2022
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9712&r=
   6. What have the 2021 Nobel laureates done for us?
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:cep:cepcnp:621>
   By: Jörn-Steffen Pischke
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=J%C3%B6rn-Steffen%20Pischke>
   Abstract: The 2021 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences was awarded to David
   Card, Joshua Angrist and Guido Imbens. Jörn-Steffen Pischke explains how
   the use of natural experiments in empirical economics, work in which they
   were pioneers, has ushered in much progress in the analysis of causal
   relationships, transforming the study of key policy challenges, including
   education, immigration and the minimum wage.
   Keywords: immigration, schools, social mobility, wages, policy, equality,
   Date: 2022–02–22
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cep:cepcnp:621&r=
   7. Can a Catholic be Liberal? Roman Catholicism and Liberalism in a
   Political Economy Perspective (1800–1970)
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03619130>
   By: Stefano Solari
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Stefano%20Solari>
(Università
   di Padova)
   Abstract: The philosophy of the Enlightenment and political thought of
   modernity found tough opposition in the Roman Catholic Church. Liberalism
   was associated with Free Masons and revolutionary intent. Nonetheless,
   liberalism and political economy stimulated some theoretical analysis and
   specific theoretical positions in terms of social philosophy and social
   economics by the Church. This paper presents an analysis of encyclical
   letters and other papal documents, as well as the writings of other
   Catholic scholars, to elaborate on the theoretical points used to contrast
   liberalism. Compromises, as well as turning points in the evolution of the
   Catholic position, are investigated. Lastly, the epistemological and
   historical reasons for the affinity of Roman Catholicism with ethical
   liberalism and the limits of this similarity are discussed. 1. Liberal and
   Catholic, an Italian drama
   Date: 2022–03–24
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03619130&r=
   8. Gender Economics: Dead-Ends and New Opportunities
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp15217>
   By: Lundberg, Shelly
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Lundberg,%20Shelly>
(University
   of California, Santa Barbara)
   Abstract: The economics literature on gender has expanded considerably
   in recent years, fueled in part by new sources of data, including from
   experimental studies of gender differences in preferences and other traits.
   At the same time, economists have been developing more realistic models of
   psychological and social influences on individual choices and the evolution
   of culture and social norms. Despite these innovations much of the
   economics of gender has been left behind, and still employs a reductive
   framing in which gender gaps in economic outcomes are either due to
   discrimination or to “choice.” I suggest here that the persistence of this
   approach is due to several distinctive economic habits of mind—strong
   priors driven by market bias and gender essentialism, a perspective that
   views the default economic agent as male, and an oft-noted tendency to
   avoid complex problems in favor of those that can be modeled simply. I also
   suggest some paths forward.
   Keywords: gender, culture, social norms, discrimination
   JEL: J16 <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=J16>
   Date: 2022–04
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp15217&r=
   9. Morals as Luxury Goods and Political Polarization
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30001>
   By: Benjamin Enke
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Benjamin%20Enke>; Mattias
   Polborn
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Mattias%20Polborn>; Alex
   Wu <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Alex%20Wu>
   Abstract: This paper develops a theory of political behavior in which
   moral values are a luxury good: the relative weight that voters place on
   moral rather than material considerations increases in income. This idea
   both generates new testable implications and ties together a broad set of
   empirical regularities about political polarization in the U.S. The model
   predicts (i) the emergence of economically left-wing elites; (ii) that more
   rich than poor people vote against their material interests; (iii) that
   within-party heterogeneity is larger among Democrats than Republicans; and
   (iv) widely-discussed realignment patterns: rich moral liberals who swing
   Democrat, and poor moral conservatives who swing Republican. Assuming that
   parties set policies by aggregating their supporters’ preferences, the
   model also predicts increasing social party polarization over time, such
   that poor moral conservatives swing Republican even though their relative
   incomes decreased. We relate these predictions to known stylized facts, and
   test our new predictions empirically.
   JEL: D03 D72
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=D03%20D72>
   Date: 2022–04
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30001&r=
   10. Remembering David Marsden
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:cep:cepcnp:625>
   By: David Metcalf
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=David%20Metcalf>
   Abstract: David Marsden, who passed away in August 2021, was involved in
   CEP research for many years, working on employment and industrial
   relations, youth employment and training, performance-related pay,
   performance management and individual employee voice. His long-time
   colleague David Metcalf recalls his broad-ranging contributions to academic
   life.
   Date: 2022–02–22
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cep:cepcnp:625&r=
   11. A Theory of Hypocrisy
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9734>
   By: Alice Hallman
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Alice%20Hallman>; Daniel
   Spiro <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Daniel%20Spiro>
   Abstract: This paper explains the occurrence of hypocrisy – when the
   by-society most despised types pretend to be the most revered types.
   Real-world phenomena include pedophile priests, sex-offender feminists and
   seemingly very busy dispensable office workers. Building on the signaling
   framework of Bernheim (1994) – where payoffs consist of an intrinsic cost
   of falsifying yourself, and a concern for social esteem – we show
   conditions for emergence of hypocrisy in equilibrium. In such equilibria
   the most despised types along with the most revered types behave
   normatively, others do not. Thus, in equilibrium there are “rumors” about
   those acting the most normatively – society infers that they are either
   truly normative or despised, but one cannot know who is who. This is to be
   distinguished from “conformity” – where the most normative and
   almost-normative types fully follow a social norm. Whether conformity or
   hypocrisy will arise in equilibrium depends on the cost of falsification,
   and the number of hypocrites depends on the weight of social esteem. Our
   theory thus shows how cultural parameters map into equilibrium culture.
   Keywords: social esteem, hypocrisy, conformity, social norm
   JEL: D70 D91 Z10
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=D70%20D91%20Z10>
   Date: 2022
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9734&r=
   12. JHET Interviews: Anthony Waterman
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:m7hds>
   By: Emmett, Ross
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Emmett,%20Ross>
   Abstract: JHET Interviews: Anthony Waterman, by Ross B. Emmett
   Date: 2022–04–09
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:osf:osfxxx:m7hds&r=

------------------------------
This nep-hpe issue is ©2022 by  <http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pth72.htm>Erik
Thomson. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It
may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If
distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org.
For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese
<http://novarese.org/> at <[log in to unmask]>. Put “NEP” in the
subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by
the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.