That's a great question! I still like that framework as a general way of organizing the vast lit in my mind, but I now think there's a big hole in it where political, corporate, and commercial determinants should be (probably because of who funds the WHO? See
Navarro, 2009, and because there's relatively a lot less research linking these to health & health inequities, especially at the time the WHO framework was formulated?). There are various articles on these other determinants, but I haven't found one that puts them all in one comprehensive, reasonably detailed, useful, and actionable framework. I attached my feeble attempt to try to adapt the WHO framework specifically to the field of adverse childhood experiences, but that left-hand box (Socioeconomic & Political Context) is very incomplete & needs as much elaboration as the right-hand side of the figure. An earlier, published version of this modified WHO figure is in
here.
I guess the framework you need & how detailed you want it to be depends on the research question you are interested in. I wanted that level of detail in the WHO framework to show how the ACEs lit was over-focused on the downstream & how there was so little to nothing going on regarding upstream factors.
I also like the figure that Dennis sent & am looking forward to how others in this group respond to this question.