Pardon me if the discussion of Nigey Lennon's essay has reached an end, but I have just now had the chance to read it -- the gate-keepers of Brown's computer system have made it difficult even for faculty to get their email -- and felt I just had to respond. The most annoying part of her essay isn't the basic errors in fact which she sprinkles throughout, to give credence to her claim as a non-academic, I suppose, but the mistaken notions of what most people who know about Mark Twain seem to think about him. List-members don't need an directory to find Lennon's slip-ups, but I will point out the most laughable one: her accusation that Justin Kaplan -- a Pulitzer and National Book Award Winner for _Mr. Clemens and Mark Twain_, in case anyone has forgotten that his biography was a truly great one -- must have projected his own neuroses onto his portrait of Twain, when in fact her essays purposely ignores the delight SLC took in his Oxford robes and his honorary degree in order to argue that he despised academia, as she herself plainly does. Anyone have any doubt who might be guilty of projection? What is the point of dressing down Nigey Lennon? Well, I would like to save other scholars the trouble of reading her books on Twain, which, like her essay, are riddled with mistakes in names, dates, titles and who knows whatall. Worse, she claims to have made original contributions to Twain scholarship -- in fact, the point of her essay is that her contributions to Twain studies have been grievously and wrongfully ignored -- when in fact her books are not only shamelessly derrivative, but full of misquotation in the process. She may be a perfectly pleasant woman, and I would love to read a good book about Frank Zappa (I camer a cross a Zappa quote lately, which goes something like: "Sometimes you can't write a chord ugly enough to represent your feelings, so y ou need a giraffe filled with whipped cream."), but to insult the dedicated folk at the Mark Twain Papers because people have ignored her bad books on the subject seems wildly unjust. People have already defended the people at the Mark Twain Papers, and I can't imagine there is anyone on this list who believes Lennon's accusations. If she can produce her "original research" and show that our intrepid workers at the Mark Twain Papers plagiarized it, I'd agree she deserves credit. But the _Roughing It_ volume is meant as a reference book, and not as a volume to make anyone a name or money. Good scholarship calls for accurate sources, not for royalty payments. Which is not to say royalties are important. Like Nigey Lennon, I am a writer first and an academic later. I think people would take her a lot more seriously if she proved herself in her work, instead of in mean-spirited, worng -headed accusations against when is arguably the best publishing archive in the world. Does she just want to sell books? Do some real research and find out something interesting and new. Hey, it has worked for me. Andy Hoffman