Just a few comments on the latest round of discussions. Mr. Dovell's noticing of new Toronto tobacco public opinion polls reminds us to look for the real story behind the headlines. This poll that shows no support for smoke-free restaurants and bars was commissioned by the Restaurant Association, methodology of which is not available to the public. In stark contrast, the GTA and Hamilton research, conducted by York's institure for Social Research and commissioned by Health Departments, was available to all. Another example of underhanded tactics by those opposing bylaws/legislation with no real basis. You'd think the health argument would be enough. As to Dennis' scolding of our health department for not endorsing the recent newspaper ad, I assure you it was very complicated and heart-wrenching for all those involved. We report to a Regional Health and Social Services committee, the Head of which was not available to yea or nay the endorsement when we needed to send it in. To make matters more difficult, on the health and Social Services Committee is Sheila Copp's mother. Endorsing an ad that directly targets your daughter was concerning for us - she was also unavailable for comment. The point is, that although our Region may have agreed to endorse the ad, there was no time to make sure that it was the proper thing to do POLITICALLY. Yes, this is frustrating, but necessary when you work within such a structure. Again another example of looking beneath the headlines. The good news is that our Council on Smoking and Health endorsed the ad. We are part of this Council. Although I know sometimes it is difficult, Advocacy efforts seem to work best when time is on our side. I would be interested to have other comments about advocacy, politics, policy, and time sensitivity. Regards, Alan McFarlane Tobacco Use Prevention Promoter Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Public Health Department