===================== HES POSTING ==================== Roy Weintraub wrote: > A less paranoid, or conspiritorial, view of the matter would argue > that someone like Arrow, engaged in his own projects, constructing > his own linkages among ideas, allies, theories, data, tools, > concepts -- deploying his own troops in Latour-Callon networks -- > understands Hayek only though his own Arrow-world, one he projects as > it were onto Hayek. For Arrow is not an historian, obligated to > understand another's views from the inside: he is an economist, a > kind of scientist, obligated to make sense of his world with tools > brought along and remade, and ideas learned and reforged. To assert > that Arrow would have been better off abandoning his own projects, > and taking up Hayek's, is just silly. In these words, Roy expresses a particular view of the development of the field of "economics." He seems to think that the field can "develop" even though major players ignore, disregard, or fail to put forth a good faith effort to understand the work of their predecessors and contemporaries. (Of course, I am not referring to any particular "economist" here.) No doubt the "field" can develop in this way. However, to the extent that it does, we cannot in good conscience attach any particular label (e.g., "economics") to it. Roy's view of the matter reflects the apparent dominant view among HESers that the history of economics is the history of people who claim to be economists or who write or speak about things that someone claims to be economics. His view also seems to be the view of the broader profession of university economists. If this is so, then it is little wonder that the history of economic thought has increasingly been relegated to the sidelines in typical economics departments at universities. If one brand of economics is as good as another, why waste time studying all the brands? -- Pat Gunning http://www.showtower.com.tw/~gunning/welcome.htm http://web.nchulc.edu.tw/~gunning/pat/welcome ============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]