>(And, please, I didn't include the Brooks quote to renew an 80-year-old debate
>on the Forum.  It's safe to assume that the vast majority of Forum members
>disagree with Brooks' analysis.)

  I do disagree, but I think there's some value in "The Ordeal of Mark Twain"
anyway. To my knowledge, Brooks was the first critic to pick up on some key
contradictions in Twain's character -- his stance as a rebel but his desire
for the approval of the establishment, for instance. Brooks' explanation of
these things has been pretty generally debunked by now, I assume, but I think
he deserves some credit for pointing these things out. To a degree, his book
determined the course of much Twain scholarship for the next 50 years or
thereabouts. Sometimes an erroneous hypothesis can still lead to productive
work, and I think Brooks qualifies.

 -- Bob G.