SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Tom Williams)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:59 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
======================= HES POSTING ==================== 
 
> To say that net output to-day is greater, but the price-level lower, 
> than ten years ago or one year ago, is a proposition of a similar 
> character to the statement that Queen Victoria was a better queen but not 
> a happier woman than Queen Elizabeth -- a proposition not without meaning 
> and not without interest, but unsuitable as material for the differential 
> calculus.  Our precision will be a mock precision if we try to use such 
> partly vague and non-quantitative concepts as the basis of a quantitative 
> analysis." 
 
Maybe I am naive.. but isn't this really and issue in cardinal versus ordinal 
propositions... and not about the price level as a concept. Note the 
"unsuitable 
as material for the differential calculus"  and "non-quantitative concepts." 
Unfortunatly, I do not keep my GT in my office to check the context. 
 
 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2