SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Samuel Bostaph)
Date:
Mon May 1 14:09:54 2006
In-Reply-To:
<008101c66d43$5f7f6a20$6501a8c0@richard>
Message-ID:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
If Richard Lipsey is to be consistent, so that no one will somehow "miss the  
point," then all non-market transactions must be excluded from the NIA.  
Housewife's labor--whatever its form--and the imputed rent for  
owner-occupied housing must not be included.  Of course, "consistency is the  
hobgoblin of little minds."  
  
Samuel Bostaph  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2