Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri Jan 12 13:10:04 2007 |
In-Reply-To: |
<45A7B9F0.25415.1200323@localhost> |
Message-ID: |
|
References: |
<45A7B9F0.25415.1200323@localhost> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Well, I checked the web as John as I prepared the same commentar as Regina.
I did not find in any language a translation and/or a translation of Bohm
Bawerk by Joaquin Reig (or his brother Luis). The refutation of Marx by
Bohm Bawerk appears several times in the Spanish translations of Mises
by Joaquin Reig but at any place, did I found an alllusion
(introduction, footnotes, whatever) to Marx reading of Bohm Bawerk (not
to say Jevons).
In a forthcoming paper (coauthored with F. & G. Quaas), we present the
"prehistory" of the transformation problem (Capital Vol 1 to Capital
Vol III). Indeed the transformation was a problem long before Bohm
Bawerk or Bortkiewiz dealt with it. F. & G. Quaas quotes a letter to
Ferdinand D. Nieuwenhuis June 27, 1880 which proves that Marx followed
this discussion involving several European economists and was
unrepentant about his theory of value at this time. (Unfortunately I
did not find an English translation of this letter, but it probably exists)
Anyway, I would also be interested to know more about this introduction
by Joaquin Reig.
Alain Alcouffe
|
|
|