SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:59 2006
Message-ID:
<v0300780caf65521f80ea@[161.32.43.155]>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Ana Maria A. F. Bianchi)
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
======================== HES POSTING ==================== 
 
Andrews: 
 
I just got back from the holiday and saw your message and all the 
replies. I guess by now you have sufficient information to place the 
paragraph that you selected in context. 
The discussion is good, anyway, in the sense that it is not limited to 
the interpretation of what precisely JMK said in the TG. It goes 
beyond that and reaches important methodological issues: 
what can one do about quantitative data in economics? 
how precise can one be? 
how precise could JMK be at the time he wrote the TG? 
are quantitative data and analysis rhetorically efficient? 
etc. 
 
 
Ana Maria Bianchi 
Universidade de Sao Paulo 
[log in to unmask] 
 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2