----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
Dear List Members, 
 
I am collecting examples of the Post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy in economic analysis.
Here under are the references known to me, I shall be appreciated to learn more related
literature.
 
(1) Hammond, Daniel (1996): Theory and Measurement: Causality Issues in Milton Friedman's
Monetary Economics, Cambridge University Press.
 
(2) Hoover, Kevin and Stephen Perez (1994): Post hoc ergo propter hoc once more: an
evaluation of  Does monetary policy matter? in the spirit of James Tobin, Journal of
Monetary Economics, 34(1):47-73.
 
(3) Hoover, Kevin and Stephen Perez (1994): Money may matter, but how could you know?
Journal of Monetary Economics, 34(1):89-99.
 
(4) Tobin, James (1970a): Money and income: Post hoc ergo propter hoc? Quarterly Journal
of Economics, 84(2):301-17.
 
(5) Friedman, Milton (1970): Money and income: Post hoc ergo propter hoc? Comment,
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(2):318-27.
 
(6) Tobin, James (1970b): Money and income: Post hoc ergo propter hoc? Rejoinder,
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(2):328-9.
 
(7) Romer, Christina and David Romer (1994): Monetary policy matters, Journal of Monetary
Economics, 34(1):75-88.
 
Cheng-chung Lai 
National Tsing Hua University 
Taiwan 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]