Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri Mar 31 17:19:21 2006 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----------------- HES POSTING -----------------
As an observer of the recent postings on "autism" in economics, I must say that I did not
take the use of autism to be a slur against the autistic nor a synonym (or equivalent
epithet) for "slime ball." Indeed, as much as any
of us might agree with the initial charge that economic theory has carried economics in an
unfortunate direction, I would hope that we have not been reduced to calling each other
names or that Professor Rockoff prefers that we should be. Rather I took "autism" to be a
metaphor that directed attention to the narrow, hyperfocused, but often, in its own terms,
quite accomplished activity of the economic theorist. There is a danger that in our
hypersensitivity we may cripple our discourse. Or am I, to analogize to an infirmity
closer to home for me, simply myopic?
Kevin Hoover
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]
|
|
|