SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Dr Roger Middleton)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:40 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
Harrod's January 1964 article was a response to Lekachman's of the previous 
month (which I do not have to hand). Harrod on p. 47 refers to widespread 
Establishment use of the phrase that 'we are all Keynesians now', but 
concludes his piece (p. 50) that, by his criteria of Keynesianism, 'it does 
not appear ... that there is any marked Keynesian influence on the conduct 
of of economic policy' in the US and UK. 
 
Roger Middleton 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2