----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
Michael Perelman wrote (27-03-01): 
 
>Since we're attributing views to one another, I would say that Tony makes 
>the case that if the classical political economists did not comment on a 
>matter, then it was certainly unimportant. 
 
I think that a (general) problem for historians of thought is that what is 
generally considered as obvious in a period, is not commented upon. Of 
course 'normality' is very important. 
 
Geert Reuten 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]