----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
Bliss has certainly been cited in the debates!  Also, there are a number of recent
contributions (by, e.g., Garegnani and Schefold) that show that the strategy by the
neoclassical camp to by-pass the capital critiques by moving to
intertemporal GE theory is not successful. 
 
The inquirer might look at Nell's The General Theory of Transformational Growth, subtitled
Keynes After Sraffa, for a recent reflection from the critics camp. Also, some recent work
from McCombie on aggregate production functions, and though I haven't looked at it,
_Capital in economic theory: neo-classical, Cambridge, and chaos_ by Syed Ahmad, Elgar,
1991, is supposed to be a 'balanced' treatment.
 
Mat Forstater 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]