SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:56 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
[NOTE: This DISC thread was preceded by several messages on the subject "Re: QUERY --
reswitching." - RBE]
 
Barkley 
 
Could you explain how Reder conflates ambiguity with anti-Semitism. He did not document
actual anti-Semitic remarks but neither did he document the positive acts in defence of
jews that he did for Schumpeter and Keynes. I did  not read Reder as claiming that Hayek
was an anti-Semite but that he shared many of the stereotypes of the period.
 
Reder's main problem is that he uses the values of today to judge people in a different
period. Against the background of the times, none of his subjects appear to be unusually
anti-Semitic.
 
Rod Hay 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2