SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Ross Emmett)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:39 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
I received the following inquiry from the Eh.Net ASK THE PROF service: 
 
Today economics is mostly divided into two main categories: microeconomics 
and macroeconomics; it wasnt like that in the past and so it is very 
difficult to understand material from (or about) those periods. I would 
like to know the modern equivalent of the terms used in the past to name 
the diferent branches of economic science; for instance, I think that "pure 
economy" corresponded pretty much to today's microeconomics, or was it 
"value theory"? Other cases would be "Business Cycle theory", "Monetary 
theory", "Capital theory", "Dynamic economics", "Wages theory", "Exchange 
theory", and any others you can think of.  
 
Ross Emmett 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2