----------------- HES POSTING -----------------
Larry Moss raises the interesting issue of authorial
attribution when a book "evolves" through a succession of
authors and co-authors. I agree with him that there is
indeed an ethical issue involved in deleting original
authors and retaining only the latest author or co-authors,
and I look for guidance from other responses to Larry's
query. The book that Larry refers to at the beginning of
his message is "Evolution of Economic Thought" by Stanley
L. Brue (not Bruce), which in the year 2000 came out in its
sixth (not fifth) edition. It is a text that I have enjoyed
using for some years. At the beginning of the section on
"Acknowledgments" in its Preface, Brue states: "Longtime
admirers of this textbook will recognize Jacob Oser's
legacy within it. Although Professor Oser was not alive to
participate in the past three editions, it retains the
features, style, and, in many places, the actual words of
the early editions. It has been an honor for me to carry on
Professor Oser's work over the past 12 years." I have found
no mention of "good reasons" by the publisher for dropping
Oser's name. A possibly good reason for doing this, both in
this case and others mentioned by Larry, is that the
revisions made in the latest edition go beyond what one of
the original authors (Oser) would have approved of, or
would have wanted to be associated with. To that extent,
and especially after the death of the original author, it
seems to me justified to omit his or her name, as long as
his or her influence is acknowledged as Brue did in this
case.
An even more extreme example of changes in authors
is the popular text on "International Economics" that
Charles Kindleberger published in 1953, and that I remember
from my graduate school days. At one point Peter Lindert
became his co-author. Subsequent editions showed Lindert as
the sole author, then Lindert and Thomas Pugel became
co-authors, and now, in its 12th edition, Pugel is the sole
author. In the Preface, Pugel states: "We are all very
happy that the book reaches its golden anniversary with
this edition. I also enjoy the mirth of a literary
improbability -- I am the author of a book that was first
published in the year I was born".
Perhaps this practice is more appropriate for
textbooks than for scholarly books, as long as the readers
are made aware of all previous authors.
Andrea Maneschi
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]
|