SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Fred Foldvary)
Date:
Mon Jul 17 11:37:51 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
> Isn't it very arrogant to think that those ideas  
> with which you disagree are fallacies?  
> Michael Perelman  
  
A fallacy is a widely-believed proposition, which the  
person who labels it a fallacy, believes lacks  
warrants in logic and evidence.  
  
The one asserting that it is a fallacy has the burden  
of pointing out where the warrants are lacking, and  
the one defending the propostion as not a fallacy has  
the burden of demonstrating the truth of the warrants  
and showing how the fallacy asserter was in error.  
  
There is no arrogance if this methodology is followed.  
  
Fred Foldvary  
  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2