SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Kevin Quinn)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:53 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
A provocative modern treatment this question by a philosopher is Margaret   
Gilbert's work, *Living Together* and *On Social Facts*. She argues for the   
irreducibility of what she calls the Plural Subject that we create through   
mutual commitments to one another in varied contexts all the time. The key   
point for economists is that goals of the Plural Subject create reasons for   
action for the individuals who make it up, reasons that are unmediated by   
references to beliefs and preferences of the individuals concerned.  She   
convincingly argues that a convention cannot be understood along Lewisian   
lines  as  an equilibrium in a coordination game  and that only something   
like the idea of a plural subject will do.  
  
  
Kevin Quinn  
  
  
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2