----------------- HES POSTING -----------------
Michael Perelman wrote (27-03-01):
>Since we're attributing views to one another, I would say that Tony makes
>the case that if the classical political economists did not comment on a
>matter, then it was certainly unimportant.
I think that a (general) problem for historians of thought is that what is
generally considered as obvious in a period, is not commented upon. Of
course 'normality' is very important.
Geert Reuten
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]