Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri Mar 31 17:18:32 2006 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a letter to F. Hayek dated Feb. 18, 1981, Paul Samuelson writes:
"As a small sample of the _increacing_ esteem that your work is
enjoying among modern economists, I enclose a xerox of a page from
a recent lecture that I gave in Vienna and that is to appear in a
book about Schumpeter (now that his Centennial is approaching)."
The passage Samuelson refers to reads:
"Schumpeter's final logic ought to have predisposed him to
accord to Hayek the final victory over Lerner and Lange in the
debate over whether a socialist state could play the game of
parametric pricing. To find new _cost_ technologies and husband
scarce knowledge as it is forever newly arriving, the letter of
Walrasian equations achievable by Lerner-Lange auctioneers and
bureaucrates serves as nothing compared to what Hayek's real life
speculators and profit receivers are led by the invisible hand of
market competition to contribute. I don't remember Schumpeter as
pronouncing on this point, but on my reading it should be congenial
to his _Weltanschauung_."
Can anyone tell me the title of this essay, and were I might
find it -- what the reference is for this paper. (also, is Samuelson
correct that Schumpeter never 'pronounced on this point' -- and if
Schumpeter was _not_ predisposed to accord final victory to Hayek, why
might this have been?).
Greg Ransom
Dept. of Philosophy
UC-Riverside
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|