SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Menno Rol)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:43 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
I can very well see what Bill Williams is doubting. "Utility" is a  
theoretical term, which refers to some invisible attribute. So the  
question is in what sense it can be observed. Does the term refer to  
some property of the behaviour of an actor in models only, or do  
ordinary people also perceive their utility? Does utility make up  
part of the ontic furniture of the economic world? The question is as  
philosopical as complex, an has not yet been fully researched. 
 
Menno Rol 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2