SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Samuel Bostaph)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:04 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
Perhaps a little clarification by Rosser on his post?  How did Frank and other define
"selfish"?  Were the economics majors they tested in liberal arts colleges with no
business program or in colleges and universities with business majors?  Did they find
psychology majors to be more introspective, English majors to have a richer fantasy life,
language majors to be more loquacious and art majors more rumpled?
 
Sam Bostaph 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2