Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri Mar 31 17:18:38 2006 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
===================== HES POSTING ====================
I tend to be on Perelman's side of this debate. Market is one thing,
market society is another, quite different one. In the market society,the
economic realm got its autonomy from the political realm, as Louis Dumont
tells us in his book _From Mandeville to Marx_.
No doubt there were markets before, in Babylonia or elsewhere, but I tend
to look at the Market Society as a modern age phenomenum. Perhaps this
happens because I was formely trained as a sociologist, before deciding
to study economics. This means that I tend to see discontinuities and
taxonomies where economists see continous lines.
The pervasiveness of market forces in our society, which grew in the last
decades as Perelman mentioned, has no equivalence in ancient times.
However, I would not infer from this observation that one should not
study market transactions in ancient societies, quite the opposite: this
seems to be a fascinating topic for a research.
Ana Maria Bianchi
Universidade de Sao Paulo
Departamento de Economia
[log in to unmask]
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]
|
|
|