SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Robin Foliet Neill)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:34 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
==================== HES POSTING =================== 
 
The economic system of the United States approximates the Neoclassical 
paradigm.  Its structure, its aspirations and values, its problems are 
easily analyzed in the context of that paradigm.  When problems arise, and 
it is necessary to predict the outcomes of alternate policies, the 
Neoclassical paradigm is both politically and pragmatically correct.  That 
is why the Neoclassical paradigm is dominant in the United States. 
 
If one wanted to analyze the very long run factors in the evolution of the 
United States economy, one would not turn to the Neoclassical paradigm.  
The demand for economists, however, depends more on the need for policy 
analysis than on the need for disinterested historical analysis.  
 
 
Robin Neill 
 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2