SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Ross B. Emmett)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:19 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (142 lines)
================= HES POSTING ================= 
 
[Given discussion last year of the use of archival material, this review  
(and the book reviewed) may be of interest to some on the list.  
Originally posted to H-LIS.--RBE] 
 
Frank G. Burke. Research and the Manuscript Tradition. In association with 
the Society of American Archivists. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press, 1997. x 
+ 310 pp. Appendix, glossary, bibliography, and index. $50.00 (cloth), 
ISBN 0-8108-3348-4.  
 
Reviewed by Susan E. Davis, University of Wisconsin, School of Library and 
Information Studies. Published by H-LIS (February, 1999)  
 
 
The title of this book would lead the reader to anticipate a narrowly 
focused approach. Indeed, in the introduction Burke specifies that his 
target reader is the "beginning researcher-academic, professional or 
amateur" rather than the "budding archivist" who will be exposed to other 
sources of information on manuscript use. But the author is shortsighted 
in his assessment of his potential audience. Burke talks about both public 
records and manuscripts, and the background and interpretations he 
provides on all facets of their management have relevance and appeal to a 
broader readership. New and experienced archivists will also learn a great 
deal from Burke's graceful and thoughtful "tour behind the scenes of a 
manuscript repository."  
 
As a professional historian, archivist, and educator, Burke is in a fairly 
unique position to reflect on the use of archival and manuscript 
materials. He has held high level positions at both the Library of 
Congress and the National Archives, served as Executive Director of the 
National Historical Publications and Records Commission, and taught for 
many years at the University of Maryland College of Library and 
Information Services. This breadth of experience gives him the perspective 
necessary to articulate both the joys of the search and the challenge for 
the professionals and institutions charged with collecting and preserving 
these valuable resources. The anecdotes and examples sprinkled throughout 
the dozen chapters are testimony to his knowledge and appreciation of the 
field of primary source research.  
 
Chapter titles are clever and literary, and chapters usually begin with an 
interesting quote. The topic of the chapter is not necessarily clear from 
the title, and the order of the chapters do not always follow expected 
logic (from the perspective of the professional archivist, which again was 
not the author's intended audience).  
 
In the first chapter, Burke uses the example of two letters written by 
William J. Calhoun, American Minister to China, posted in Peking and dated 
December 1911 and January 1912, to illustrate the differences between 
personal papers and official documents. This comparison of content and 
motive for writing gets at the heart of archival theory--that records and 
papers are created in the course of normal ongoing activity for a reason. 
This provenance is significant in terms of how documents should be 
appraised, arranged, and described, as well as who owns physical and 
intellectual property. Burke returns to these two letters several times 
throughout the book to make specific points.  
 
In the second chapter, "The Recovery of Reality," Burke explores the 
different ways in which information is recorded, from forms of legal and 
routine documentation to the kinds of materials individuals create when 
trying to tell their version of a story or event. He suggests that 
researchers often utilize the papers of state and local government 
officials to verify the stories told in diaries, letters, and newspapers. 
He argues that the scholarly focus on "Great White Men" was not 
necessarily because archivists chose not to save alternative materials, 
but rather that historians selected safer subjects. Materials have always 
been there, just not necessarily as accessible.  
 
Burke next turns to the ways in which researchers locate materials. He 
describes sources such as the National Union Catalog of Manuscript 
Collections as well as other published tools that include the holdings of 
many repositories, explaining the quirks and pitfalls of various 
approaches, as well as links between collection level descriptions and 
more detailed finding aids. This is the first of several chapters that 
will become dated as electronic methods of access multiply, and Burke 
acknowledges that fact.  
 
Access policies and the role of the archivist/curator are also covered in 
later chapters. Chapter Nine, "The Cultural Crypt," ties intellectual 
access to physical access and the policies and procedures that 
repositories impose to maintain security over their collections of unique 
materials. Chapter Eleven provides an excellent introduction to the legal 
and ethical issues that govern both access to and use of historical 
resources. Burke not only explains the Freedom of Information and Privacy 
Acts and copyright law (the latter already outdated by recent legislation) 
but also provides useful interpretation of several legal cases which 
involved contested use of manuscript materials. This chapter will be a 
particularly useful reference for archival educators trying to communicate 
the complexities of ownership and access to their students.  
 
Several chapters in the middle of the book cover the range of activities 
undertaken by archives and manuscript repositories as they acquire, 
arrange, and describe collections. Why does a particular collection end up 
in a specific repository? How do archivists choose what to retain and what 
to discard? Chapter Five, "Mapping the Roads to the Past," is a 
particularly nice introduction to the challenges of processing collections 
and the differences between organizational records and personal papers. 
Burke clearly explains the levels at which certain kinds of activities are 
likely to take place in organizations and the lack of equivalent 
hierarchies in manuscript collections that makes research more difficult.  
 
Any text that discusses the status of technology in a field is obviously 
going to become outdated rather quickly, and this book is no exception. 
Burke refers to the ways in which archivists are using computers to create 
finding aids and provide access within their institutions and to a larger 
audience. Chapter Six, "Tradition Confronts Technology," is particularly 
detailed in the guidance it provides to researchers maneuvering through 
online systems of bibliographic information. But Burke also discusses the 
ways in which the computer is changing the means people use to create and 
store their documents and the challenge future generations of archivists 
and researchers will face in piecing together the historical record. These 
are challenges that are moving to the top of the professional agenda for 
archivists.  
 
The least useful chapter to a broad audience is the one on documentary 
editing, and the amount of attention devoted to this topic is indicative 
of Burke's years at the National Historical Publications and Records 
Commission, which has provided funding for many of these multi-year 
projects.  
 
This is not a reference book, nor is it easy to browse or search the 
index. Individual chapters can stand alone, but the book is best read in 
its entirety. A brief glossary of acronyms used follows the text, as does 
a bibliography of both professional references and primary and secondary 
sources consulted. The citations at the end of each chapter are 
particularly useful.  
 
The price of this book will put it out of the reach of the average person, 
which is unfortunate. Burke has provided both the researcher and the 
archivist a well-written and thoughtful explanation of the rewards and 
challenges of working with archives and manuscript holdings, one which 
reminded me of the reasons I and my colleagues have remained involved in 
such work for so many years.  
 
Citation: Susan E. Davis . "Review of Frank G. Burke, Research and the 
Manuscript Tradition," H-LIS, H-Net Reviews, February, 1999. URL: 
http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=3899923075317.  
 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2