SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Fred Carstensen)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:27 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
Chas has it right--but reveals the issue: When do we know there is "an 
excessive amount of money circulating in the economy"? The issue is not 
theoretical--we can always construct a model that generates the outcome we 
want to generate--but empirical. He also reveals a critical insight into 
the importance of monetization--namely the importance of liquidity to 
commercial health. He notes the need for "balance."  Ah, yes. But again 
that is not a theoretical question, but an empirical one. 
 
My original question arose from the apparent inflexibility of some 
theoretical prescriptions being floated in the discussion. They don't help 
in practice; theory can and should inform policy choices, that is, framing 
policy, but within the frame there is still a lot of latitude.   
 
Fred Carstensen 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2