Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri Mar 31 17:19:22 2006 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Here is an example of why those interested in the history of economics
such as Robert Dimand should take Rushton, or by extension, human
biology and genetics, seriously. Ashkenazi Jews are a high IQ,
economically successful group, that has also suffered from
discrimination and persecution over the years. There are also certain
genetic diseases which have a high incidence among this group. A group
at the University of Utah has put forth a hypothesis that links these
facts to natural selection for intelligence among this group.
Albert Himoe
Read the the paper here
<http://homepage.mac.com/harpend/.Public/AshkenaziIQ.jbiosocsci.pdf> :
This paper elaborates the hypothesis that the unique demography and
sociology of Ashkenazim in medieval Europe selected for intelligence.
Ashkenazi literacy, economic specialization, and closure to inward gene
flow led to a social environment in which there was high fitness payoff
to intelligence, specifically verbal and mathematical intelligence but
not spatial ability. As with any regime of strong directional selection
on a quantitative trait, genetic variants that were otherwise fitness
reducing rose in frequency. In particular we propose that the well-known
clusters of Ashkenazi genetic diseases, the sphingolipid cluster and the
DNA repair cluster in particular, increase intelligence in
heterozygotes.
Other Ashkenazi disorders are known to increase intelligence. Although
these disorders have been attributed to a bottleneck in Ashkenazi
history and consequent genetic drift, there is no evidence of any
bottleneck. Gene frequencies at a large number of autosomal loci show
that if there was a bottleneck then subsequent gene flow from Europeans
must have been very large, obliterating the effects of any bottleneck.
The clustering of the disorders in only a few pathways and the presence
at elevated frequency of more than one deleterious allele at many of
them could not have been produced by drift. Instead these are signatures
of strong and recent natural selection.
|
|
|