----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
In response to Susan Feiner: 
 
The context of the discussion here had to do, at least in part, with the queston of what
what it was which was _new_ in Smith.  If someone coming after Smith did the same sort of
thing later which Smith had done earlier, this would
not count against Smith for having done something significant before others.   
 
Greg Ransom 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]