John, the term "liberal activist" is in the article; so I used the
author's words and those with which Roy Weintraub is presumably
comfortable. Liberal means left in ordinary terminology. Thus, my
question is whether the Center is becoming political.
I don't know why Humberto published your post. But I feel it is worth
telling you and him that, as I read it, it seems both rash and uncivil.
It is little more than nasty name calling. And it is certainly a
misunderstanding of the thrust of my questions.
On 1/26/2011 9:43 AM, John Brown wrote:
> My initial response to the CHOPE posting was that it was certain to
> inspire a Pavlovian response from the followers of Glenn Beck who have
> been indoctrinated to believe that George Soros is the source of a
> progressive conspiracy. I was disappointed that Pat Gunning whose
> voluminous postings on this list I have respected if not always agreed
> with chose to frame the Soros' donation in these terms. There is much
> that could be said, but that would devolve into an ideological debate
> not suitable for this forum. Thus I confine myself to two observations:
>
> 1) Something really significant happened in the world economy about 30
> months ago. The existing orthodoxy about the behavior of market
> economies failed utterly. Thus some new thinking would seem to be
> indicated. To paraphrase Abraham Lincoln, the doctrines of the quiet
> past are not useful for the turbulent present.
>
> 2) Since Soros was a child during the Nazi occupation of Hungary, and
> also experienced life under Communism, he probably has no sympathy for
> the authoritarian central planning systems both societies employed.
> Ascribing such motives to him is at least unfair.
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Pat Gunning <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> This message deserves to be scrutinized, it seems to me.
>
> ...[t]he produce of the whole labour of the society is so great,
> that all are often abundantly supplied, and a workman, even of the
> lowest and poorest order, if he is frugal and industrious, may
> enjoy a greater share of the necessaries and conveniencies of life
> than it is possible for any savage to acquire.
>
> "The causesof this improvement, in the productive powers of
> labour, and the order, according to which its produce is naturally
> distributedamong the different ranks and conditions of men in the
> society, make the subject of the First Book of this Inquiry."
>
> "To explainin what has consisted the revenue of the great body of
> the people, or what has been the natureof those funds, which, in
> different ages and nations, have supplied their annual
> consumption, is the object ofthese Four first Books. The Fifth and
> last Book treats of the revenue of the sovereign, or commonwealth."
>
> (Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations, Introduction)
>
>
> Steve Hartsoe writes of the "Global Effort to Boost Economics
> Education" that the core mission of economics is that of "guiding
> and protecting society."
>
> "Guiding and protecting society" was hardly the traditional
> mission of economics. What makes it the "core" mission? If the
> people at the center agree with this core mission on the basis of
> their knowledge of the history of economic thought, it seems to me
> that true students of the history of economic thought should shun
> this center. Would George Soros, liberal activist, have financed
> the mission that is implicit in the "Wealth of Nations?"
>
> How is society likely to be guided and protected, whatever that
> means, by studying "the history of economics," the "history of
> economic thought," history, and "economic history?" Is it to be
> guided by the study of active monetary policy and discretionary
> fiscal policy, regulations, price controls, restrictions on "the
> natural distribution" etc.? Is it to be protected by the study of
> environmental protection, consumer protection and government
> control of healthcare, old age, disability, and unemployment
> insurance? Is it to be protected against foreign competition,
> unfair competition, unjust prices, unjust incomes, unjust culture,
> bad luck? And what does economics have to say about the guiders
> and the protectors?
>
> Can the core mission be accomplished by studying the "the
> teachings of venerable economists Friedrich August Hayek and John
> Maynard Keynes? Well, no and yes, it seems to me.
>
> Does anybody from the Center have good answers to the general
> thrust of my questions? Or, in different terms, has Soros funding
> turned the "Center" to the left?
>
>
> On 1/25/2011 10:04 AM, E. Roy Weintraub wrote:
>
> Duke Joins Global Effeort to Boost Economics Education
>
> Project funded by George Soros will allow Center for the
> History of
> Political Economy to expand programs
>
> By Steve Hartsoe
>
> Monday, January 24, 2011
>
> (Duke News Service)
>
> DURHAM, NC -- As part of a larger effort to better understand the
> global economic meltdown, Duke’s Center for the History of
> Political
> Economy is among a handful of schools looking to change the way
> economists are educated.
>
> Behind this push is The Institute for New Economic Thinking
> (INET), a
> foundation launched in 2009 with an initial $50 million pledge
> from
> billionaire financier and liberal activist George Soros.
>
> Overall, more than 50 grantees from 11 countries are involved in
> finding solutions for the challenges of the 21st century by
> returning
> economics “to its core mission of guiding and protecting society,”
> according to a news release from INET.
>
> The institute has awarded a three-year grant of $750,000 to
> the Duke
> center, which will serve as one of only four initial task forces
> selected by INET.
>
> The money will allow the Duke center to expand its programs, which
> include a fellowship and visiting scholars program, workshop
> and lunch
> series, a summer teaching institute, a speaker series, and annual
> conferences.
>
> An expanded summer institute will begin this summer, with
> classes held
> at Duke and aimed at Ph.D. students from the top economics
> programs
> throughout the country. The added funding will help support more
> visiting fellows as well as Ph.D. students enrolled at Duke who
> specialize in the history of economics.
>
> “There’s much to be learned from the history of economics,”
> says Bruce
> Caldwell, an economics researcher at Duke and founder-director
> of the
> center, which was established in 2008 with a mission of
> promoting and
> supporting the teaching of, and research in, the history of
> economic
> thought.
>
> “While a better understanding of history provides no silver
> bullets,
> it does provide perspective and insight.”
>
> The teachers trained through programs at the Duke center “will
> be key
> assets in restoring the history of economics as a fundamental
> part of
> economic training and academia,” Robert Johnson, executive
> director of
> INET, said in a statement.
>
> In addition to awarding a grant to the Duke center, INET has named
> Caldwell to its advisory board, which includes five Nobel
> laureates in
> economics.
>
> Caldwell says the teaching of the history of economics has been in
> decline across economics departments worldwide.
>
> “As historians of thought retire, they are not being replaced,” he
> says. “Too many economists fail to recognize the importance of a
> knowledge of how their discipline developed, and, lacking that
> knowledge themselves, they do not realize that many of the
> questions
> being debated today in fact have long histories.
>
> "We are trying to change the way that economists think about their
> discipline. It is a big assignment, but a vitally important one.”
>
> The recent economic crisis has sparked a renewed interest in
> economic
> history, especially the teachings of venerable economists
> Friedrich
> August Hayek andJohn Maynard Keynes, according to Caldwell.
>
> INET’s Inaugural Grant Program received more than 500 applications
> from around the world, and selected 34 initiatives to be awarded
> grants totaling $7 million. The grant program will continue
> with two
> similar grant cycles annually, the next one beginning this spring.
>
> “It’s great for the center, and it’s great for Duke, which has
> for a
> long time had a stellar reputation in the field,” Caldwell
> says. “This
> recognition has reaffirmed its place within the international
> community.”
>
> Since its inception, the Duke center has received grants from a
> diversity of sources, including the John W. Pope Foundation, the
> National Endowment for the Humanities, the Earhart Foundation,
> and the
> Thomas Smith Foundation.
>
>
>
> --
> Pat Gunning
> Professor of Economics
> Melbourne, Florida
> http://www.nomadpress.com/gunning/welcome.htm
>
>
>
>
> --
> *An optimist, often disappointed, but still hopeful.*
>
> John Howard Brown, Ph.D. *Physical Mail*
> Associate Professor P.O. Box
> 8152
> School of Economic Development School of
> Economic Development
> Georgia Southern University Georgia
> Southern University
>
> Statesboro, GA 30460
>
> *Telephone* (912) 478-0896 Fax (912) 478-0710
> *
>
> *
--
Pat Gunning
Professor of Economics
Melbourne, Florida
http://www.nomadpress.com/gunning/welcome.htm
|