SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Samuel Bostaph)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:47 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Mises makes that exact point   
[see Julio Huato's post, http://eh.net/pipermail/hes/2005-May/003038.html ]    
in HUMAN ACTION in his critique of mathematical modeling in economics.  He contrasts the
logic of thought with that of action in arguing that math modeling is inappropriate
theorizing for social theory of the world actually inhabited by humans.  I don't have a
copy at hand or I would cite the chapter and section for those unfamiliar with the book.
  
Sam Bostaph  
  
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2