SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Nicholas J. Theocarakis)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:14 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
I agree with Hans Visser that the "animal spirits" concept in Keynes does not refer
specifically to physiology, or that it does not have any profound philiosophical
connotation, Cartesian, Bergsonian or other. I do not think, however, that a Galenic
influence was ever suggested. Simply, as it very often happens, old medical theories and
concepts die hard in other fields or common parlance (e.g., the concept of "lucid
interval" in jurisprudence, "moron", "idiot" and "imbecile" in everyday language). Keynes
used "animal spirits" as a colloquial expression to denote the mood of the entrepreneurs,
but from a economic theoretical standpoint the concept is very important as it is hard to
pin down.
 
Nicholas Theocarakis 
National University of Athens 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2