SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Mary Schweitzer)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:38 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
======================= HES POSTING ================= 
 
Brad De Long wrote: 
 
> I think I agree with Greg Ransom, that "perfect competition" is an 
> appallingly constricting straitjacket. But it is one that most economists 
> used to and that many economists still wear... 
 
Most economists use "perfect competition" as a rhetorical conceit, 
with which to compare the particular case they are analyzing -- because 
MOST economists are not pure theoreticians.  They do not analyze 
"perfect competition", but the ways in which the problem they are 
studyomg differ from it, and consequently how to explain possible or 
existing outcomes. 
 
Mary Schweitzer, Assoc. Prof., Dept. of History, Villanova University 
(on medical leave) 
<[log in to unmask]> 
 
 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2