SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:15 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
Harvey C. Mansfield briefly contrasts Smith vs. Marx on the nature of self-interest in his
article "Self-Interest Rightly Understood" (Political Theory, Vol. 23, Issue 1, Feb. 1995,
48-66.)
 
According to Mansfield, Smith follows Montesquieu and Hume in regarding self-interest as
natural; the system of natural liberty makes use of self-interest to promote the general
good. Marx, however, builds on the Rousseau-Kant-Hegel tradition that views the present
human condition (the condition of the interested self) as highly unnatural. The
contradictions inherent in the nature that Smith accepts must be resolved, for Marx, in
the dialectical process of history.
 
Jack Bladel 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2