SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Daniel W. Bromley)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:27 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
J. Womack asks how did Coase get in here? 
 
To the extent that property rights are the essence of economic 
institutions, and to the extent that a firm is a manifestation of 
particular institutional arrangements (that is, a firm is a going concern 
defined by particular institutional arrangements that have obtained social 
legitimacy), then Coase (1937) and Coase (1960) easily fits.  And, in this 
context, we should not overlook Commons' LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF CAPITALISM as 
pertinent to the study of economic institutions which--to many of 
us--comprise the "legal" foundations (a la Wesley Hohfeld) of an economy 
(whether capitalist or otherwise). 
 
Dan Bromley 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2