SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Steven G. Medema)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:07 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
I have a friend who is an Austen expert and has written a series of "Jane Austen Mystery"
novels, and she provided the following tidbit:
 
"The fixed incomes were derived from money invested in the Government Funds--essentially
bonds that paid a fixed four percent per annum. Thus, a yearly income of 10K a year
probably represented the four percent interest Darcy derived from his investments, not the
rents from his estates. His actual inheritance/net worth would have been far more vast.
When a man in his position could easily spend 700 guineas on a good hunter (the guinea at
the time being a pound plus one shilling), and probably kept a stable of several, he'd
need a bit of blunt."
 
Steve Medema 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2