SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Kevin Quinn)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:31 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
I think Humberto is right to point to the different way efficiency is used 
in engineering. I don't think the crucial difference is the one he 
highlights, though. Engineers want optimality, too, but they want the 
maximum *physical* output from given inputs. Economists want the maximum 
*utility* output from the inputs. With this change, I don't see much 
difference. The First Welfare Theorem says that any reallocation of an 
input will reduce the output of utility. A reallocation may well reduce 
energy usage, or raise the  number of tons of GDP produced, or some such. 
We don't care!  Engineers ignore values. 
 
Kevin Quinn 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2