SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Colander, David)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:03 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
I'd agree with much of what Robin says about Robbins, but Robin's position is undermined
when he says that "economics deals with relative value." In my view, Robbins' economics
deals with relative price, not relative value.  What the relationship of price is to value
is a complicated issue that necessarily raises questions of ethics.  As economists came to
understand that, what was taught in micro evolved from being called value theory to being
called price theory.  Today all we teach is price theory, although by the lack of
discussion of how price theory does not necessarily reflect value, we often mislead
students into thinking we are teaching them more than what we are.
 
Dave Colander 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2