----------------- HES POSTING -----------------
I cannot repond to this question with respect to English economics of the
19th C, but in America in the late 19th and early 20th C there was intense
interest in how the work of psychologists might be applied to economics.
The most obvious case is perhaps Thorstein Veblen who was interested in the
psychology of William James and others (including Freud). Another person
who tried to analyse labor unrest in term of instinct theory was Carlton
Parker (writing in around 1915-1917, and Parker had been turned onto this
material by William Ogburn, later a well known sociologist at Columbia and
Chicago, and a Columbia PhD in Sociology. Wesley Mitchell was also
interested in psychological applications to economics, although mainly
McDougall and other instinct theorists. F. C. Mills, a student of both
Parker's amd Mitchell's, has spoken of his experience between 1915 and 1917
as follows:
When I was studying at California and later at Columbia, there was a
feeling that exciting new prospects for economics had been revealed by
recent work in psychology. In seminar at California, and to a lesser
degree at Columbia, the work of McDougall in social psychology, John B.
Watson on behaviorism, Patrick on the psychology of relaxation, Trotter on
instincts of the herd in peace and war, Crile and others working in
psycho-physiological fields, James Harvey Robinson on the making of the
mind, and of course Freud (but this, it seems in retrospect, only
incidentally), struck us with tremendous impact. That stream of thought in
some ways supplemented the one flowing from Peirce, James and Dewey. . . .
Veblen again, particularly in raising questions as to why economics was
not an evolutionary science, seemed to cut away other pillars. All of this
provided a climate thoroughly opposed to the rationalistic tenets of
classical economic thought (F. C. Mills to Milton Friedman, 25 June 1951).
Malcolm Rutherford
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]
|