SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Benjamin Balak)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:11 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
But let's remember that the culprit is the motivated ideological INTERPRETATION of Smith.
If we actually read Smith we find that the "Enronization" of society was precisely his
primary concern. Jerry Evenski & others have developed this point over the past decade &
should feel vindicated today.
 
In general I find that the best tool to explore the "badlands" between professional
economic discourse & its lay (popular & political) translation can best be addressed with
rhetorical analysis. Many have expressed doubts concerning the usefulness of all these "
cultural-studies" in economics (rhetoric, postmodernism, etc.). It seems to me those
doubts have proven misplaced in this day & age.
 
Benjamin Balak 
Rollins College 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2