Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri Mar 31 17:18:47 2006 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Here's a source for my claim of a deeper meaning for literacy.
Usage Note: For most of its long history in English, literate has meant only=
=93familiar with literature,=94 or more generally, =93well-educated,=
learned.=94 Only since the late 19th century has it also come to refer to=
the basic ability to read and write. Its antonym illiterate has an equally=
broad range of meanings: an illiterate person may be incapable of reading a=
shopping list or unable to grasp an allusion to Shakespeare or Keats. The=
term functional illiterate is often used to describe a person who can read=
or write to some degree, but below a minimum level required to function in=
even a limited social situation or job setting. An aliterate person, by=
contrast, is one who is capable of reading and writing but who has little=
interest in doing so, whether out of indifference to learning in general or=
from a preference for seeking information and entertainment by other means.=
=B7More recently, the meanings of the words literacy and illiteracy have=
been extended from their original connection with reading and literature to=
any body of knowledge. For example, =93geographic illiterates=94 cannot=
identify the countries on a map, and =93computer illiterates=94 are unable=
to use a word-processing system. All of these uses of literacy and=
illiteracy are acceptable.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=3Dliterate
Humberto Barreto
|
|
|