SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Shah Sumitra)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:07 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
This is a link to an article from the Economist: "Cents and Sensibility" which describes a
longer article by an investment fund manager.
http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1785682 It is an amusing
aside, particularly for those among us who love Jane Austen. For the economic historians,
I have a query. How did Darcy get a fixed income when interest rates were
changing/declining? He may have received rent as a landed gentry, but the fixed part must
have come from inheritance. And there was always mention in the novels of that period of a
"fixed" annual income which determined for the women their chance to be married and for
the men to be admired.
 
Sumitra Shah 
 
 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2