TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Twain/Whitman
From:
Harold Bush <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:38:21 -0600
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
Really?  That's an intriguing tidbit, never heard about that one... Alan;
or anyone -- have you read that essay?  and if so: what's the context of
MT's coverage of WW?

-hb

On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Alan Gribben <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Twain showed familiarity with the controversy about his verse in a n=
> ever-completed essay written around 1880.
>



-- 
Harold K. Bush, Ph.D
Professor of English
Saint Louis University
St. Louis, MO  63108
314-977-3616 (w); 314-771-6795 (h)
<www.slu.edu/x23809.xml>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2